FOOD STANDARDS NOTIFICATION SERVICE
NOTIFICATION CIRCULAR [2-05]
23 March 2005
This Notification Circular includes notices that are required to be given to the public, submitters and appropriate government agencies, under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act). All references below to sections of legislation, are to the FSANZ Act unless otherwise indicated.
Further information about the applications, proposals and other matters mentioned below, including assessment reports and – where applicable – reasons for decisions, can be accessed on the FSANZ website at www.foodstandards.gov.au under <Standards Development>and then <Documents for Public Comment>. Persons may contact FSANZ at one of the addresses below to arrange alternative access to these documents:
The Information Officer | The Office Administrator |
Food Standards Australia New Zealand | Food Standards Australia New Zealand |
PO Box 7186 | PO Box 10559 |
CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 | WELLINGTON 6036 |
AUSTRALIA | NEW ZEALAND |
Tel +61 2 6271 2241 Fax +61 2 6271 2278 | Tel +64 4 978 5630 Fax +64 4 473 9855 |
Email: info@foodstandards.gov.au | Email: info@foodstandards.govt.nz |
General questions on the work of FSANZ should be directed to the Information Officer at the address above. Queries concerning the matters in this Circular or application or submission processes should be directed to the Standards Management Officer at slo@foodstandards.gov.au .
PROGRESS ON APPLICATIONS AND PROPOSALS
NOTICES. The notice below was published on 23 March 2005 in The Australian and The New Zealand Herald newspapers as well as on the Food Standards Australia New Zealand website.
DRAFT ASSESSMENT – APPLICATIONS[s.17(2), s.17A(2)]
FSANZ has prepared draft food regulatory measures or variations for the following Applications; will make Final Assessments in relation to each of these drafts; and invites written submissions for the purpose of making a Final Assessment by 6pm (Canberra time) 4 May 2005:
- Application A499 – To permit the Sale of Roquefort Cheese: to amend Standard 2.5.4 in the Code to permit the sale of Roquefort cheese made from raw (that is, not pasteurised or thermised) sheep’s milk.
- Application A543 – Food from Insect-protected, Glufosinate Ammonium-tolerant Corn Line 59122-7: to permit the use of food from corn genetically modified to provide resistance to insects and glufosinate ammonium.
- Application A544 – Ice Structuring Protein as a Processing Aid for Ice Cream & Edible Ices: to permit the use of an ice-structuring protein preparation for the manufacture of ice cream and edible ices.
- Application A547–Maximum Residue Limits (September, October, November, December 2004).*#
DRAFT ASSESSMENT – PROPOSALS [s.17AA(1), s.17AB(1)]
FSANZ has prepared draft food regulatory measures or variations for the following Proposal; will make a Final Assessment in relation to the drafts; and invites written submissions for the purpose of making a Final Assessment by 6pm (Canberra time) 4 May 2005:
- Proposal P292–Country of Origin Labelling of Food: to review the current provisions regarding mandatory country of origin labelling contained in Standard 1.1A.3 in the context of policy guidelines developed by the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council.
FINAL ASSESSMENT AND COUNCIL NOTIFICATION – APPLICATIONS AND PROPOSALS – DRAFT STANDARDS [s.19(1), s.20(4A)]
After making Final Assessments in relation to draft standards or variations for the following Applications and Proposals, FSANZ decided to approve the draft under section 18 of the FSANZ Act. FSANZ has given the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) written notification of these approvals.
- Application A464 – Definition of ‘Wholegrain’.
- Application A493 – Iodine as a Processing Aid.
- Application A513 – Octanoic Acid as a Processing Aid.
- Application A522 – DHA-rich Micro-algal Oil from Ulkenia sp. as a Novel Food.
- Application A534 – Maximum Residue Limits (March, April, May 2004).#
- Proposal P265 – Primary Production & Processing Standard for Seafood.#
- Proposal P284 – Minor Amendments Omnibus V.
EFFECT OF DIVISIONS 3 AND 4 OF PART 3 OF THE FSANZ ACT
A standard or variation approved by FSANZ does not become legally enforceable until:
- the Ministerial Council has been notified of the standard or variation; and
- the Ministerial Council process in relation to the standard or variation is finalised; and
- FSANZ has fulfilled the publication requirements under the FSANZ Act.
Once FSANZ has notified the Ministerial Council that it has approved the draft standard or variation, the Ministerial Council has 60 days to either request FSANZ to review the approved standard or inform FSANZ that it does not intend to request a review.
If the Ministerial Council requests a review, FSANZ must, within 3 months (or longer if the Ministerial Council allows), complete the review and notify the Ministerial Council of a decision to either:
- maintain its original approval; or
- to amend its approval; or
- withdraw its approval; and
give the Ministerial Council FSANZ’s reasons for its decision.
If FSANZ has not withdrawn its approval, the Ministerial Council has another 60 days to either request a second review or inform FSANZ that it does not intend to request a second review. If the Ministerial Council requests a second review, the procedures and timeframe are the same as for the first review. Once an approved standard has been reviewed twice, the Ministerial Council has 60 days to inform FSANZ that the Council does not intend to amend or reject the approved standard, or to amend or reject the approved standard.
If the Ministerial Council informs FSANZ that:
- it does not intend to request a review of the approved standard; or
- it does not intend to amend or reject the approved standard; or
- it has amended the approved standard after the second review;
FSANZ will publish a notice in the Commonwealth (published by FSANZ as the Food Standards Gazette) and New ZealandGazettes and in newspapers stating when the standard or variation comes into effect. FSANZ will also publish this notice along with the text of the standard on the FSANZ website and make copies of these available for inspection by the public. The standard becomes legally effective on the date specified in the notice.
MINISTERIAL COUNCIL REVIEW PROCESS – APPROVED DRAFT STANDARDS (s.21 – 23))
In accordance with these requirements, FSANZ has completed its First Review in relation to the following Application and re-affirmed its approval of the approved draft Standard:
- Application A424 – Fortification of Foods with Calcium.
APPLICATION WITHDRAWN [s.12A(2)]
The following Application has been withdrawn by the Applicant:
- Application A480 – Mandatory Declaration of the Presence of Allergenic Substances in Food.
OTHER MATTERS
Amendment 76 Published
Amendment 76 to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code was published by FSANZ on 17 February 2005. It included an amendment resulting from the following Application:
- Application A509 – Food derived from Insect-Protected Cotton Line COT102.
# These matters relate to ‘Australia only’ standards that are not part of the joint regulatory arrangements with New Zealand. However, food from Australia complying with these standards may be supplied in New Zealand. Anyone may provide submissions in relation to these matters.
* Indicates a matter in relation to which FSANZ has decided not to hold a round of consultation between Initial and Draft Assessment, as it is satisfied that omitting to hold such consultation will not have a significant adverse effect on the interests of anyone/the Application raises issues of minor significance or complexity only (s. 36(1C)). A person whose interests are affected by this decision may: subject to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, make an application to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of FSANZ’s decision; and except where subsection 28(4) of that Act applies, in accordance with section 28, may apply for a statement in writing setting out the findings of material questions of fact, referring to the evidence or other materials on which those findings were based and giving the reasons for the decision.
