FOOD STANDARDS NOTIFICATION SERVICE
NOTIFICATION CIRCULAR [4-05]
25 May 2005
This Notification Circular includes notices that are required to be given to the public, submitters and appropriate government agencies, under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act). All references below to sections of legislation, are to the FSANZ Act unless otherwise indicated.
Further information about the applications, proposals and other matters mentioned below, including assessment reports and – where applicable – reasons for decisions, can be accessed on the FSANZ website at www.foodstandards.gov.au under <Standards Development>and then <Documents for Public Comment>. Persons may contact FSANZ at one of the addresses below to arrange alternative access to these documents:
The Information Officer | The Office Administrator |
Food Standards Australia New Zealand | Food Standards Australia New Zealand |
PO Box 7186 | PO Box 10559 |
CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 | WELLINGTON 6036 |
AUSTRALIA | NEW ZEALAND |
Tel +61 2 6271 2241 Fax +61 2 6271 2278 | Tel +64 4 978 5630 Fax +64 4 473 9855 |
Email: info@foodstandards.gov.au | Email: info@foodstandards.govt.nz |
General questions on the work of FSANZ should be directed to the Information Officer at the address above. Queries concerning the matters in this Circular or application or submission processes should be directed to the Standards Management Officer at slo@foodstandards.gov.au .
PROGRESS ON APPLICATIONS AND PROPOSALS
NOTICES. The notice below was published on 25 May 2005 in The Australian and The New Zealand Herald newspapers as well as on the Food Standards Australia New Zealand website.
INITIAL ASSESSMENT - APPLICATIONS [s.14(1)]
FSANZ received applications for the development or variation of the following food regulatory measures; accepted the Applications after making Initial Assessments of them; will make Draft Assessments of these Applications; and invites written submissions on matters relevant to the Applications to be made to FSANZ by 6pm (Canberra time) 6 July 2005:
- Application A512 – Definition of Meat Pies: to ensure that meat pies can only contain ‘meat flesh’ and not just ‘meat’. [Received 3 September 2003]
- Application A519 – Lipase from Penicillium roquefortii as a Processing Aid (Enzyme): to permit the use of a new microbial source for triacylglycerol lipase sourced from Penicillium roquefortii. [Received 6 November 2003]
- Application A546 – Tara Gum as a Food Additive: to permit the use of a new food additive, Tara gum, in a variety of foods including dairy products, preserved fruits and vegetables, flour and bakery products, meat and fish products, and alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. [Received 6 September 2004]
DRAFT ASSESSMENT – APPLICATIONS[s.17(2), s.17A(2)]
FSANZ has prepared draft food regulatory measures or variations for the following Applications; will make Final Assessments in relation to each of these drafts; and invites written submissions for the purpose of making a Final Assessment by 6pm (Canberra time) 6 July 2005:
- Application A470 – Formulated Beverages: to permit the addition of all vitamins and minerals to water-based non-alcoholic beverages.
- Application A516 – Lipase from Candida rugosa as a Processing Aid (Enzyme): to permit the use of a new microbial source for triacylglycerol lipase sourced from Candida rugosa.
- Application A533–Food derived from Glufosinate-ammonium-tolerant Cotton Line LL25: to permit the use in food of oil and linters derived from cotton seed genetically modified to provide resistance to the herbicide glufosinate-ammonium.
- Application A550 – Maximum Residue Limits – Sulphaquinoxaline (Antibiotic).*#
- Application A557 – Maximum Residue Limits - Lasalocid (Antibiotic).*#
- Application A558 – Maximum Residue Limits (Antibiotics)*#
After making a Draft Assessment of the following Application, FSANZ decided to reject the Application:
- Application A489 – Allergen Labelling on Single Serve Packages in Outer Packaging: to clarify allergen labelling requirements for individual single serve packages contained in outer packages.
DRAFT ASSESSMENT – PROPOSALS [s.17AA(1), s.17AB(1)]
FSANZ has prepared draft food regulatory measures or variations for the following Proposal; will make a Final Assessment in relation to the drafts; and invites written submissions for the purpose of making a Final Assessment by 6pm (Canberra time) 20 July 2005:
- Proposal P288–Food Safety Programs for Food Service to Vulnerable Populations: to amend Standard 3.2.1 to make food safety programs mandatory in food service in which potentially hazardous food is served to vulnerable populations.
- Proposal P289 – Food Safety Programs for the Producers of Manufactured & Fermented Meats: to amend Standard 3.2.1 to provide for application of food safety programs for those food businesses that produce manufactured and fermented meats.
FINAL ASSESSMENT AND COUNCIL NOTIFICATION – APPLICATIONS AND PROPOSALS – DRAFT STANDARDS [s.19(1), s.20(4A)]
After making Final Assessments in relation to draft standards or variations for the following Applications and Proposals, FSANZ decided to approve the draft under section 18 of the FSANZ Act. FSANZ has given the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) written notification of these approvals.
- Application A469 – Saccharin in Water-based Flavoured Drinks.
- Application A525 – Food derived from Herbicide-tolerant Sugar Beet H7-1.
- Application A541 – Maximum Residue Limits (June, July, August 2004 ).#
EFFECT OF DIVISIONS 3 AND 4 OF PART 3 OF THE FSANZ ACT
A standard or variation approved by FSANZ does not become legally enforceable until:
- the Ministerial Council has been notified of the standard or variation; and
- the Ministerial Council process in relation to the standard or variation is finalised; and
- FSANZ has fulfilled the publication requirements under the FSANZ Act.
Once FSANZ has notified the Ministerial Council that it has approved the draft standard or variation, the Ministerial Council has 60 days to either request FSANZ to review the approved standard or inform FSANZ that it does not intend to request a review.
If the Ministerial Council requests a review, FSANZ must, within 3 months (or longer if the Ministerial Council allows), complete the review and notify the Ministerial Council of a decision to either:
- maintain its original approval; or
- to amend its approval; or
- withdraw its approval; and
give the Ministerial Council FSANZ’s reasons for its decision.
If FSANZ has not withdrawn its approval, the Ministerial Council has another 60 days to either request a second review or inform FSANZ that it does not intend to request a second review. If the Ministerial Council requests a second review, the procedures and timeframe are the same as for the first review. Once an approved standard has been reviewed twice, the Ministerial Council has 60 days to inform FSANZ that the Council does not intend to amend or reject the approved standard, or to amend or reject the approved standard.
If the Ministerial Council informs FSANZ that:
- it does not intend to request a review of the approved standard; or
- it does not intend to amend or reject the approved standard; or
- it has amended the approved standard after the second review;
FSANZ will publish a notice in the Commonwealth (published by FSANZ as the Food Standards Gazette) and New Zealand Gazettes and in newspapers stating when the standard or variation comes into effect.
FSANZ will also publish this notice along with the text of the standard on the FSANZ website and make copies of these available for inspection by the public. The standard becomes legally effective on the date specified in the notice.
APPLICATION WITHDRAWN [s.12A(2)]
The following Application has been withdrawn by the Applicant:
- Application A515 – Cyclamate Level in Tabletop Sweeteners.
OTHER MATTERS
Work Plan
FSANZ is required under s.10A of the FSANZ Act to develop and publish a three-year forward plan for applications, proposals and types of applications and proposals on which it intends to develop standards or variations to standards.
In developing this three year forward plan, FSANZ must consult interested persons not later than 30 June in each year. Written submissions are therefore invited on the Work Plan by 22 June 2004. Submissions should be addressed to one of the addresses below:
Standards Management Officer | Standards Management Officer |
Food Standards Australia New Zealand | Food Standards Australia New Zealand |
PO Box 7186 | PO Box 10559 |
CANBERRA BC ACT 2610 | WELLINGTON 6036 |
AUSTRALIA | NEW ZEALAND |
Email: slo@foodstandards.gov.au | Email: slo@foodstandards.gov.au |
Amendment 77 Published
Amendment 77 to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code was published by FSANZ on 28 April 2005. It included amendments resulting from the following Applications:
- Application A518 – Food derived from Insect-protected, Herbicide-tolerant Cotton Line MXB-13.
- Application A526 – Maximum Residue Limits (January, February 2004). #
- Application A538 – Maximum Residue Limits - Benzocaine (Local Anaesthetic). #
# These matters relate to ‘Australia only’ standards that are not part of the joint regulatory arrangements with New Zealand. However, food from Australia complying with these standards may be supplied in New Zealand. Anyone may provide submissions in relation to these matters.
* Indicates a matter in relation to which FSANZ has decided not to hold a round of consultation between Initial and Draft Assessment, as it is satisfied that omitting to hold such consultation will not have a significant adverse effect on the interests of anyone/the Application raises issues of minor significance or complexity only (s. 36(1C)). A person whose interests are affected by this decision may: subject to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, make an application to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of FSANZ’s decision; and except where subsection 28(4) of that Act applies, in accordance with section 28, may apply for a statement in writing setting out the findings of material questions of fact, referring to the evidence or other materials on which those findings were based and giving the reasons for the decision.